Connect with us

News

Supreme Court strikes out law that allowed government to impose restrictions during Covid-19 pandemic – Skyy Power FM

Published

on

Supreme Court strikes out law that allowed government to impose restrictions during Covid-19 pandemic – Skyy Power FM

In a unanimous ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that the law allowing the government to impose limitations during the Covid-19 outbreak was unconstitutional.

The Imposition of Limits Act was passed by Parliament in 2020 to permit the imposition of the limits outlined in Article 21 of Ghana’s 1992 constitution.

The aforementioned constitutional provisions provide limitations to be imposed on the movement or residency of any person or persons generally, or any class of persons, inside Ghana in the interest of defence, public safety, public health, or the administration of critical services.

This law allowed the government to issue various instruments while health authorities managed the Covid-19 pandemic.

READ ALSO:  It will be high treason if Minority MPs go against Supreme Court ruling

This is the law that allowed the President to restrict public gatherings, shut down schools, and impose measures to guide religious gatherings among others.

Law Professor and Human Rights advocate Kwadwo Appiagyei-Atua along with eight others dragged government to the Supreme Court contending the said law was unconstitutional.

He contended it unlawfully empowered the President to unilaterally suspend fundamental human rights and freedoms in the whole or a part of Ghana, excluding the special role of the Chief Justice and the Superior Court of Judicature in managing or regulating the suspension of fundamental human rights and freedoms in the whole or a part of Ghana; and excluding the role of Parliament in managing or regulating the suspension of fundamental human rights and freedoms in the whole or a part of Ghana.

READ ALSO:  Digitisation: Transparency International lauds Ghana

A seven-member panel presided over by Justice Jones Dotse agreed with this view.

The court ruled that the Imposition of Restrictions Act is inconsistent with the Constitution.

He, therefore, announced that the said law is struck down as unconstitutional, null and void. The court’s full reasons will be made available on June 7.

The case was heard by Justices Jones Dotse, Nene Amegatcher, Nii Ashie Kotey, Lovelace Johnson, Amadu Tanko, Prof Henrietta Mensah Bonsu and Emmanuel Kulendi.

Source: skyypowerfm.com

Trending