Connect with us

Opinion

Decision to Merge GIJ, GIL and NAFTI thoughtless

Published

on

GIJ
Decision to Merge GIJ, GIL and NAFTI thoughtless

Contrary to the positions of the Rectors of the three specialized institutions in throwing their support behind the half-baked decision of government to merge the institutions just to attained the status of a fully-fledged university.

Aside the burial and loss of the ‘identities’ and ‘histories’ of NAFTI, GIL, and GIJ after the merger, I think the stakeholders failed to reason out of the box.

What we have done with this merger is to amplify the living and working conditions of the Teachers and Workers of these institutions without paying attention to the products.

These institutions have excelled exclusively in their respective space without a tag of university. Alumni of these institutions have and always remained proud.

No one is crying foul for graduating from an institute of journalism, filming, and languages instead of university. Nay!…

READ ALSO:  Cognitive Dissonance and hidden trauma

Rather than focusing on adding value to products of these institutes, we have rather curiously turned our attention to merging and changing their identities.

What has the merger got to do with the professional standing of the trainees?

We just wasted a fine opportunity to add value to how journalism and filming is done in Ghana.

Yes, the opportunity to empower GIJ, NAFTI AND GIL to license and accredit people desiring to practice in the media space. We messed the chance to sanitize our film industry. We have foolishly, and sheepishly trashed the road to make GIL an authority of languages in Ghana.

Like CIMA, GIJ could be a certified professional institution responsible for managing journalists with useful media certification.

READ ALSO:  US President-elect, Joe Biden writes to Nana Addo

Like ACCA, we could have simply made NAFTI in charge of validating film makers. And like IPR, GIL could have just been made the body vetting and accrediting professionals accordingly.

With these, we would have a move a step into enhancing the quality of journalism, language and film making in our beloved country.

We could have simply transformed these specialized institutions into advanced media practice license bodies.

We should have a standardize ways of separating the boys from the men.

This way, licenses of offending practitioners could be suspended, and revoke when need arise.

I have no regret saying our stakeholders are dots in a circle. They are nothing short of landlocked.

By Charles McCarthy

@TheHawkNewspaper

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

thirteen − 10 =

Trending